this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
21 points (71.4% liked)
conservative
960 readers
5 users here now
A community to discuss conservative politics and views.
Rules:
-
No racism or bigotry.
-
Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn't provide the right to personally insult others.
-
No spam posting.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don't cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.
-
No trolling.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
What suggests to you that this is the case?
If it's the manifesto release, i don't see how that equates to attention on the subject. Various PDs are going to have different policies on the release of information.
And if it's the media coverage, there was a shit load of coverage of Audrey Hale, so I don't see why you're making a complaint over lack of attention.
But it was covered, extensively so by both sides.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/28/us/audrey-hale-nashville-school-shooting/index.html
Looking at this article from a leftist source, in not a single spot do they go "this is her pronouns! Respect them or else! Wraaa!". Nor do they blame christians.
I don't think you have an accurate view of what leftist new sources were saying.
Wording it like that is itself agenda driven. You don't want accuracy, you just want the headlines to fit a specific agenda, one that derides trans people and plays towards the christian persecution fetish.
There is no such agenda. Most shooters are white men, so most coverage is of white men.
Yeah, it's almost like it is dangerous to suggest that minority groups are dangerous, so journalists need to be careful with their wording when talking negatively of minorities. It's almost like historically people used stories of evil minorities to murder minorities.