this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
387 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

60021 readers
3342 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
387
Leaks confirm low takeup for Windows 11 (www.theregister.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s to c/technology
239 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Leaks confirm low takeup for Windows 11::Time to rethink Windows 10 support cycle then?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My theory is that after 98 windows started to follow the "this one shit, next one good" pattern. ME was shit, XP was great, Vista was shit, 7 was great, 8 was shit, 10 is good. Obviously 11 is shit and if the pattern holds the next one will be good again.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

The issue with that theory is that the "good" keep getting worse and the "shits" plumb the depths more and more with each cycle.

They look good when comparing it with the last one but I would say ME (I used ME as a teen I know it) was better then Vista and Vista was better then 8 and 8 was better then 11.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Microsoft decided to skip Windows 9 because, after doing a lot of research, they found that a lot of commonly used legacy software had implemented compatibility hacks which involved checking for "Windows 9" to detect when the software was running under either Windows 95 or Windows 98.

Instead of breaking a lot of software or requiring a lot of updates (some of which could even be from vendors who were no longer in business) they decided to work around the problem by just skipping straight to 10.

Edit: My mistake, I responded to the wrong comment. But I'm gonna leave it here because I already typed it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Version check on Windows 9x was done by comparing with the number 4, which was the internal version number, not with the marketing name.