this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
1465 points (97.5% liked)

Science Memes

11287 readers
2890 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
1465
Double-slit (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
126 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What if u look at only one of the slits?

[–] Gabu 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same deal, you're still measuring and can still determine which photons passed through which slit.

[–] fruitSnackSupreme 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But then you potentially wouldn't be interacting with all the photons right?

[–] Gabu 1 points 1 year ago

You are, just not in an intuitive way. Because you'd know the rate of emission of your light source, the information of when a photon passes slit-2 would still "tag" them (whatever photon didn't pass slit-1 must have passed slit-2).