this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
52 points (98.1% liked)

Canada

7290 readers
246 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] twelvefloatinghands 28 points 1 year ago (14 children)

I like the sound of that. Pharmacare seems like an obviously good policy.

Are there any decent arguments against it?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

It kind of seems like the Liberals are freaking out about finances right now. They don't want to keep running big deficits, but they're also afraid to hike taxes while they're already weak in the polls, so they're resorting to things like cutting defence spending in a moment where the world is edging towards war.

In the end higher taxes are probably what needs to happen. The conservatives will razz them for it, but that's much better even from a purely electoral standpoint then a snap election right now.

[–] twelvefloatinghands 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I though pharmacare was one of those things that paid for itself with the single point of negotiation and reduced need for emergency care? I don't really remember the numbers...

[–] NotMyOldRedditName 2 points 1 year ago

You don't see those results immediately, so it's easy to campaign against at first.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, emergency care is also a provincial responsibility, and a single point of negotiation is moot from a federal budget perspective if the alternative is to pay nothing and let people fend for themselves. To society I'm sure it's the better, cheaper option, though.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)