Perhaps I'm being difficult, but I'm not deriving pleasure from documentaries the way I used to. I realize I'm speaking in generalities, please humor me.
I find the presentation of most modern docs so hyperdramatic and forced, it detracts from the underlying subject matter.
I would prefer if documentaries tried their best to collect and present information in a fascinating way, and present it as reasonably neutral as possible, with some leeway for the author's voice. I don't appreciate it when the superficial presentation constantly tries to cue me emotionally.
I really don't understand why I have to have violen symphony music playing like it's the eve of world war 3, and all the nukes are about to be launched, when I'm watching a documentary about snail parasites or particle collider research.
Even though it's different auditorially, to me it's the same principle as applying a laugh track to a comedy show. I don't need it suggested to me when something is funny, and I don't need to be cued by string orchestra music that something is serious or worrisome. Please trust me to make these judgments on my own!
I think all trends ebb and flow but this one seems to have taken root and it's doesn't seem to be letting up.
I wonder if other people feel this way, or if I'm just watching the wrong things?
Recent, no sadly.
This is at the crux of my grievance, when I watch documentaries that are 20 or 30 years old or more, what I see are raw looks at interesting topics that don't have this kind of presentation.
I'm scrambling to find anything made in the last 15 years where the presentation is reasonably neutral, and mundanity isn't presented in a hyper dramatic way. Or where the superficial presentation style completely overwhelms the more sober reality of the underlying topic