this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
791 points (95.6% liked)

World News

39172 readers
3599 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
791
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by jeffw to c/world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Compared to the atrocities of the fairly recent past? The Rape of Nanking, the Holocaust, the Eastern Front, even Manifest Destiny?

Absolutely. Even assuming the worst, because unlike then mass extermination wasn't the point, which is what they claimed it was.

[–] FlyingSquid -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't realize it was a contest. What is the minimum number of people to not count as "pretty low?"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

In case you've forgotten the context of this internet argument, the original commenter implied the world was seeing unprecedented wars launched solely to kill as many people as possible.

So if they could point to a war in the last two decades that killed, idk, five million people solely to kill five million people, like the Second Congo War, that'd be a start, but it still wouldn't be at all comparable to the ethnic cleansings of the past.

[–] FlyingSquid -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think there's ever been a war solely to kill people. There are always other factors even when there's a genocide going on. So if that is your criterion, the number is zero.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fair enough, how about wars in the past thirty years where at least a secondary goal is genocide of some sort or another?

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 1 year ago

Then you run into a definition of genocide. A lot of people would consider what Israel is doing right now to be genocide.