this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
30 points (96.9% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5808 readers
1195 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
30
People working on climate solutions are facing a big obstacle: conspiracy theories (www.npr.org)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] homesweethomeMrL 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

NPR doing their thing.

Tell us, NPR, if climate activists are having to fight conspiracy theories - presumably those theories came from somewhere? Are they autonomous? Sentient? No? Then why use them instead of saying big oil, fox news, Q social, the republiQan party, are what people working to save the planet have to fight with every day?

Hm? Why bundle them all under “conspiracy theories”? Why not “people working on climate solutions facing a big obstacle: nouns”. Or “:scowly old people”?

This is what NPR does. They’re ostensibly progressive, but their content is so mealy-mouthed and obscurant they only help republiQans feel better.

Never got around to calling “enhanced interrogations” torture either. Reasons unknown.