this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
84 points (95.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35312 readers
831 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Forget all the stuff out there that says the GDPR protects EU citizens. This is a question of jurisdiction and enforcement. Say I run a blog under a business registered in the US funded by advertisers in the US. A EU citizen that comments on posts issues a GDPR request that I ignore. Their government fines me. I tell them to get bent, I am out of their jurisdiction. What can they do at that point?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Based on your replies to other comments, it seems you don't see how the GDPR, or GDPR fines, could have any effect on US companies.

https://www.enforcementtracker.com/

Sort the list by fines, and you find US companies paying whopping amounts. Many affect their EU presence (such as Meta Platforms Ireland Limited), but others don't (such as Meta Platforms, Inc.).

Ask yourself if these giants were just too nice to give in, or if they were too poor to hire a lawyer.

If you think both options are unrealistic, maybe the GDPR does have an effect even on US companies.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the largest assumption you are making is that the OP does business with the EU. If they do not, they are truly out of the jurisdiction of GDPR and wouldn't be finding themselves on that list. Those fines you are referring to a multinational corps that definitely do a lot of business within the EU.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the largest assumption you are making is that the OP does business with the EU. If they do not, they are truly out of the jurisdiction of GDPR

GDPR applies to American enterprises if they process personal data of EU citizens.

If you serve a website which is accessible to EU citizens, and that site collects personal data or allows users to enter personal data, GDPR most probably applies to you. IANAL.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

True, but it's important to note that personal data means identifiers such as name, date of birth, location, etc. Comments on a blog, by themselves, are not personal data.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the comment keeps your IP address, and/or your email, or a nickname, it can be considered personal data.

The “simple” rule is : does that info, once used with other data, can allow someone to figure out who you are ? If so, then it’s personal. From there, always validate with a lawyer who is actually properly trained on the GDPR to review your decision.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree about logging IP addresses or emails.

But I am not so sure that usernames or nicknames are necessarily identifiers. For example, if someone posts as "IamtherealTomHanks", you can't actually identify who they are.

[–] neanderthal 1 points 1 year ago

"Ask yourself if these giants were just too nice to give in, or if they were too poor to hire a lawyer."

Option 3, cheaper to pay than to fight it. If you aren't from the US, people have pled guilty to even criminal charges because the cost of going to court and fighting it is higher than what is offered in the plea deal. Option 4, public backlash not worth the cost.