this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
665 points (88.2% liked)

politics

19246 readers
3483 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I don't see why dairy should be subsidized but some plant milks aren't exactly environmentally friendly either. The best can be said is they're better than dairy, assuming the same land could be used for both. But they can be devastating in their own right. E.g. to grow 1 almond (i.e. one kernel) takes over 3 gallons of water. Other crops used to make milk like oats have lower water consumption.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The almond example is frequently brought up, but this is still half of what dairy milk requires, without taking into account the difference in land use too

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

the sources of the water are vastly different though. the totals for dairy milk include the rainwater that grows the grass but otherwise is inaccessible to humans. the almonds, by contrast, are irrigated. not to mention the potable water that goes directly into the final product.

[–] TurtleJoe 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You think most dairy cows are fed on naturally watered grass?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know exactly what dairy cows are fed, but I do know that most cows eat mostly grass for most of their lives.

[–] jeffw 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most cows where? In the wild, sure. The meat we eat? Hell no

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you don't know what you're talking about.

[–] trashgirlfriend 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they do start eating grass but most cows end up getting fed stuff like corn, grains, alfafa etc.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

right, on the feedlot, which is the last 1/4 of their life or so.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

They can be, in NZ there are is a huge amount of land that has been converted to dairy through massive irrigation schemes which has caused massive problems for the rivers that flow naturally through these places... I imagine there are other places in the world used for dairy that wouldn't be suitable if not for irrigation?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Like I said better than dairy but still awful. Moreso because almonds are grown in places like California where water is being depleted.

[–] arin 2 points 1 year ago
[–] ilikekeyboards 2 points 1 year ago

It's better for the environment for us just to die off......

There must be a middle point though

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Here's why dairy should be subsidized. Because all farms should be subsidized. Most of our food production needs to be subsidized to prevent bad economic shifts creating financial hardships that sink farms and lead to a food shortfall.

I mean, here's a microcosm for you. Some seafood verticals had price swings recently, and when the swings hit bottom, it was actually cheaper to keep the boat in port than go out for a trip. If the swings remained or kept going down, it would have tanked some of the smaller fishing companies. So when that swing would end, the shortage of production would have the opposite effect - dramatically higher fish prices. Yes, that'll get people back into the industry... bigger businesses that will carefully milk the increased prices instead of simply increasing food availability.

Now, the way dairy and and beef farms are subsidized is a problem right now. Even most farmers are against it. Most dairy farms don't get a penny (and in fact, PAY IN. I'm not kidding), while the larger factory farms get their feed fully paid for and large scale production subsidized.

That does mean you're probably not actually seeing a penny of price savings from the subsidies. People tend to forget that when blaming subsidies in the price of milk vs plant-milk.

[–] QuaffPotions 1 points 1 year ago

The environmental problems of growing plants isn't because of the individual plants, it's because the farming practices used are bad (conventional industrial ag, synthetic fertilizers, monoculture, etc). In a well designed polycultural system, almonds can have their place too. But there is no way to make animal ag sustainable, and since that has both deep ethical and health problems as well - why bother?