United Kingdom

4299 readers

452 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Revealed: UK government keeping files on education critics’ social media activity (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 year ago by skhayfa to c/[email protected]

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Sue Cowley, an education expert who runs training for schools, tweeted her response to the records she had been sent under her name this week: “Excuse my language but WTAF [what the actual fuck] are the DfE doing spending taxpayer money conducting surveillance on critics of government policy on here?”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Staff collected a dossier of critical social media posts, cross-referencing anonymous Twitter accounts with private Facebook wedding photos.

There's trying to understand your constituent's concerns and then there is spying on your constituent's wedding photos. I dunno, maybe local government is totally comfortable with that 🤷? And get this.... because these people wanted better special educational needs provision from their council. Heavens above the gall of these people, right?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There’s trying to understand your constituent’s concerns and then there is spying on your constituent’s wedding photos.

Which is why I said it was dodgy - it clearly is.

However - imagine you are getting a lot of flack from an anonymous Twitter account - it's fairly obvious that you are going to be asked who this person is. Seeing if they use the same handle on Facebook is a pretty obvious first step. I'm not quite sure what 'private Facebook wedding photos' means in this context - the photos will either have to be shared with 'Everyone' or shared in a group that the council offer is also a member of. So, private how?

because these people wanted better special educational needs provision from their council. Heavens above the gall of these people, right?

Usually the first step in this situations is to try and get the resident some help - if they have a particular problem, you will normally ask them to DM you the details so you can escalate to the right people. I spent about a week chasing up for some poor person who was having a grim time trying to get a repair done - and that's pretty typical. If it is an anonymous campaign group without specific complaints, yes you are going to be curious as to who they are.

I'm absolutely not saying that what the council did here is right - an enquiry is absolutely warranted and they may have been bang out of order. But I'm saying it may not simply be a descent into fascism.