this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
101 points (89.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

30038 readers
294 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We have cars for earth, boats for water and planes for air. Nothing for fire. Not that I want to ride on fire.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While fire itself may not have mass or density, the materials involved in the fire (fuel and oxygen) do have density.

In the context of a rocket engine, the combustion process involves the ejection of high-speed exhaust gases, which have mass and therefore contribute to the overall density of the vehicle.

[–] partial_accumen 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We're in agreement on the physics of rocket propulsion. However, "fire" is essentially defined as a chemical oxidation reaction. The reaction itself doesn't have mass. While fuel and oxidizer undergo the oxidation reaction, it isn't the reaction itself providing the propulsion, its the mass and velocity of the combustion products.

This is why the "natural element" definition is old and out-of-date. Any discussion of "fire" as an element is a philosophical or literary exercise, not a scientific one.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you nailed it - fire is not analogous to earth, wind, and water (and heart), so the premise of the post is confounded.

[–] spittingimage 2 points 1 year ago

I tried to imagine a vehicle for travelling on a surface of Heart, then decided I don't want to.