this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
94 points (93.5% liked)

World News

39056 readers
4036 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

President Joe Biden said on Monday the threat of Russian President Vladimir Putin using tactical nuclear weapons is "real", days after denouncing Russia's deployment of such weapons in Belarus. On Saturday, Biden called Putin's announcement that Russia had deployed its first tactical nuclear weapons to Belarus "absolutely irresponsible".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BombOmOm 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The idea-here is two-fold:

  • One cannot allow any country to gain an advantage by detonating nukes, if that is allowed, more nukes will be used in the future. Using a nuke in any capacity has to be so detrimental that actually using one is never worth it.
  • If the exchange is currently limited to tactical nukes against military targets, there is still an escalation path to MAD, and that is best to be avoided.

With those ideas in mind, the West does have a response available that doesn't bring us to MAD, but does make another using a tactical nuke in any capacity an awful idea: overwhelming conventional force.

If Russia gains a local tactical advantage by nuking 5,000 Ukrainian troops, then a response that involves the entire Russian Black Sea fleet exploding, logistical depots all over the front exploding, troops all over the front exploding, and the Kerch Bridge exploding has made what was a tactical victory for Russia into a massive strategic defeat for Russia. Using this method, we have not escalated to MAD, and have made it a very, very poor idea to use nukes for any purpose.

Does that mean the NATO plan explicitly says it should be conventional?

I am not aware of an explicit plan that says only a conventional response is authorized. However, notable US commanders have said a direct and overwhelming conventional response from the West is what will likely occur if Russia uses tactical nukes against Ukrainian troops.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Mutually assured destruction

[–] BombOmOm 4 points 1 year ago

Mutually Assured Destruction.

The idea that if one country targets cities with nukes, nothing will stop both countries from having large swaths of their cities and infrastructure destroyed from the following nuclear exchange. Therefore, it is in the best interest of both countries to never target an enemy city with nukes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The US military undoubtedly has secret abilities they do not advertise. My guess is that in the event of real nuclear threat they will reveal and use something we've never seen before. Large scale EMP attacks perhaps?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago