this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
979 points (97.7% liked)

Dank Memes

6189 readers
335 users here now

This is the place to be on the interweb when Reddit irreversibly becomes a meme itself and implodes

If you are existing mods from r/dankmemes, you should be mod here too, kindly DM me on either platform

The many rules inherited from

  1. Be nice, don't be not nice
  2. No Bigotry or Bullying
  3. Don't be a dick!
  4. Censor any and all personal information from posts and comments
  5. No spam, outside links, or videos.
  6. No Metabaiting
  7. No brigading
  8. Keep it dank!
  9. Mark NSFW and spoilers appropriately
  10. NO REEEEEEE-POSTS!
  11. No shitposting
  12. Format your meme correctly. No posts where the title is the meme caption!
  13. No agenda posting!
  14. Don't be a critic
  15. Karma threshold? What's that?

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FooBarrington 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There is one simple reason: the bigger the game, the fewer other games you can install. So why spend time optimising size on disk, if it will just cut into the live service profits of your game?

[–] 9point6 12 points 1 year ago

Honestly, I'd not considered this angle before, but I would not be surprised at all if a product manager at Activision has had this thought.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think that's a reason they use. If anything, I'd expect live servicr games to benefit from the game being smaller, because they want players to not uninstall it when they're feeling finished.

But "why bother" certainly is. There's not that many players who will not buy your game just because it's big. Most games are focused on the initial sale. Optimizing for size is expensive. Why spend thousands of dollars of expensive software dev time while making the game more complex to test for something that won't affect many sales? Especially compared to fixing bugs or adding more noticeable features. Software dev is always a matter of tradeoffs. Unless you're making something like a mars probe, there will always be bugs. Always always always. How many people will complain about a bug (which unexpectedly turned out to be game breaking in some niche case you didn't think about)?

[–] FooBarrington 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't think that's a reason they use. If anything, I'd expect live servicr games to benefit from the game being smaller, because they want players to not uninstall it when they're feeling finished.

The smaller the game, the more likely you are to uninstall when you're done, because it's easier to re-install (and you don't need to free up lots of space). Large size means you'll keep it installed so you don't miss the next content drop. Keeping it installed means you're more likely to play, because you have less choice.

It's a combination of sunk cost and FOMO.

[–] Buddahriffic 1 points 1 year ago

It cuts both ways. If you're low on disk space, you can uninstall 10 small games or just one large game.

Though personally, I've been happy after I threw in a larger SATA SSD and now I can move installs from my faster NVME drives to the slower one when I want more fast space. I generally ignore the games smaller than 5gb when trying to find more space.