14
this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
14 points (76.9% liked)
Xbox
5266 readers
77 users here now
An Xbox community for Lemmy!
UNIVERSAL XBOX SUBSCRIBE LINK - CLICK HERE
Click this to open this community in your Specific Instance, then click Subscribe
Rules:
- Stay on topic.
- No hate speech.
- No Politics.
- No console wars. We are all gamers.
- No Clickbait
- Be a decent human.
- No piracy talk or links to copywrited content.
QUICK START GUIDE AND RULES:
New to Lemmy?
View the Getting Started Guide
Attributions:
Xbox Logo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:XBOX_logo_2012.svg
Banner : https://www.xbox.com/en-us/wallpapers/
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That some BS right there. Stanfield is one thing but an existing IP that was on Playstation as well as Xbox should still be allowed on Playstation.
Why? It should release exactly where the owners want it to.
Now I generally don't agree with exclusives on any platform as the hardware should speak for itself but Sony are the absolute worst for exclusive games.
Sony developed the studios and talent that are responsible for its most famous exclusives. On the other hand, Microsoft's wallet did the all the heavy lifting. Either way, it doesn't entitle Sony access to Microsoft's property.
I mean, you just said it yourself.
Microsoft now owns Bethesda, and so, any future Elder Scrolls releases. That is now Microsoft's property. Just because previous games in the series released on PlayStation, doesn't entitle future releases to be on PlayStation.
Yeah I literally said that lmao. I was just responding to what seemed like a strange comparison to make between the two companies' exclusives. It only makes sense that PS would be so protective of their exclusives when they invested so much time and effort (and money) into them. Microsoft also invested into their exclusives, but that looked a little different lol