Privacy

31957 readers

745 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Open Source Keyboard with Swipe for Android (lemmy.sweeney.social)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've been having a look for one but can't find any. Am I missing something obvious?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it's feature complete, a keyboard doesn't need regular updates. According to the other thread it's not feature complete, so it could be abandoned. Since it's FOSS any enthusiastic person could stop it from being abandoned.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

expired

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree in this case.

But there's a narrative that software needs regular updates or it's worthless, but some things are just done and stable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh, yes. Absolutely. The "this software is newer therefore better" or "it gets more updates so I know it's better software" affirmations make about as much sense as "my complete rewrite of Shakespeare's work using a vocabulary of 200 words is better because it is newer" or "this mathematical proof uses more paper, so I know it's better".

This "argumentum ad novitatem" fallacy grinds my gear almost as much as the "argumentum ad populum" one...

Unfortunately, both argumentations are really common in FOSS (and in software in general). 😑