this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
406 points (96.6% liked)

Ukraine

8205 readers
757 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

U.S. billionaire Elon Musk has agreed to sell a portion of Starlink assets to the U.S. Department of Defense, removing himself from decision-making regarding geofencing Ukraine’s access to the satellite internet service

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Don't laugh too hard. We are the ones paying the bill for it.

ie, Our taxes are now indirectly ended up directly in Elon's pocket. And, I can promise he didn't cut us a deal.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a small price to pay if it results in saving Ukrainian lives by having it in more capable, less idiotic hands.

[–] Coreidan 2 points 1 year ago

by having it in more capable, less idiotic hands.

Whoa hey let’s not get too carried away. We are talking about the US government after all.

[–] ikidd 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You never know. The threat of an extraordinary rendition to Ukraine might have kept the price down.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

After hearing of the story I wondered if Elon could be charged under Ukrainian law as some sort of accomplice / aid to enemy operations and potentially detained and extradited by a country more actively supportive of anti-Russian operations should Elon go on vacation to such a country. (do I have to say Poland? Because I'm thinking Poland.)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Did Starlink and SpaceX not already receive a lot of government funding for their rockets etc? You could argue that the taxpayers should own x% because they paid the bill for it...