this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
1318 points (98.5% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29080 readers
209 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages πŸ”₯

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to [email protected] e-mail.

Report contact

Donations πŸ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] drapermache 50 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This is what I like about Lemmy and the fediverse; Its not like some rich company or person could really take over Lemmy and then pull a twitter or a reddit. The only way I could see things going south is if corporations start buying popular instances and then creating terrible policies and/or mine all of the data collected in the Lemmy instance, but with Lemmy you could just move to another instance.

Right now I feel like were in the same position when Linux started out - really cool in concept but with no clear way to monetize which causes doubts for its future. It wasn't until RedHat really popularized the support for enterprises model that Linux really solidified its future; they found a way to monetize open source projects. Lemmy itself is very young and will need to have its RedHat moment, otherwise its doomed to fail -- donations are nice but are never enough.

As a side note to this - I find it funny that companies are super eager to replace people at the bottom with AI when in my mind it would be easier to replace a CEO with AI to ingest company data and make cost-cutting decisions, or to be able to look at the market and determine what a company should be doing in order to compete. CEO positions are the most expensive for a company so eliminating it with a machine would save investors TONS of money. It would never need meetings, just take in input of whats going on in the company and externally in its competing market.

[–] Brickhead92 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We'll need someone to input that data, I guess we'll need to create a new position for that.

I shall be the CAIIO (chief AI input officer) and may salary will only be $150m.

[–] OpenHammer6677 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey that's a lot of work for one dude. I'll be your associate. I shall be the ACAIIO and my salary is twice as much as yours because of the longer title

[–] Freesoftwareenjoyer 4 points 1 year ago

Guys, we can all share. I'm sure we can create plenty of management and HR positions for everyone ;)

[–] Freesoftwareenjoyer 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I disagree. The Free Software movement and the GNU/Linux operating system weren't created for profit, but for user freedom. There is nothing wrong with making money in an ethical way (unlike what Reddit does), but that is not necessary for projects to survive and there are plenty of examples of this. Debian for example is a fully free operating system and it's maintained entirely by volunteers for free.

The Free Software Foundation, Mozilla Foundation, Blender Foundation. They are all non-profits.

[–] spiritedpause 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The only way I could see things going south is if corporations start buying popular instances

It's not quite the same, but Meta/Instagram is working on a Twitter competitor that will use ActivityPub and therefore is essentially one huge Fediverse instance that they're launching.

https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/11/meta_twitter_rival/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I didn’t know their version would use ActivityPub, that’s very interesting.

[–] MBM 2 points 1 year ago

AI CEOs sound like a nightmare, lol. They're exactly as capitalistic as the data they trained on but now "the AI said it so it must be objectively good"