this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
65 points (93.3% liked)

Technology

59452 readers
3830 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
65
Perl still relevant in 2023/24? (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/technology
71 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

hi, i was interested if perl is still relevant in this day and age. Perl has been on the decline for a very long time now. Perl 6 (now named 'raku) not being backwards compatible with perl 5 code made the already small perl community even smaller by splitting it in half. A good example is lisp with it's thousands of different dialects.

Is it still worth using or is it bound to legacy software forever? Like cobol.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] slinkyninja -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Writing legible Perl code is the complete antithesis of what the language was created for. This comment shows a complete misunderstanding of Larry Wall’s work.

[–] elbarto777 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol what are you talking about?! What is this LW's point you're referring to? "Write non-readable code, everyone"?

I'm guessing you're referring to him saying "there's more than one way to do things", and that's not mutually exclusive from writing legible code.

[–] slinkyninja 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

There’s an obfuscated C contest too - no one ever assumed that K&R opposed highly legible code. I seem to recall that Kerrigan actually wrote some books to the contrary.

[–] elbarto777 0 points 1 year ago

That's a non-argument, man. You just linked to a contest.

That's like saying that the FAA endorses unsafe airplane building practices because they hold a contest about unmanned cardboard made planes that fly the most length in a desert without crashing.