this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
125 points (85.7% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

1391 readers
4 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post as opposed to arguing.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (13 children)

communism and tankies

pick one, because they are not interchangeable.
One is antithetical to authoritarianism, and the other seeks nothing but.
There is plenty of good reason for LGBTQ+ folks to be attracted to communism.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Anarcho-communism is antithetical to authoritarianism. But the use of the word today is nearly synonymous with Lenin’s or Bolshevik’s communism (and their further variations by multiple future parties, like Mao-communism), because this was the only flavor that actually existed as ideology in countries where communist parties were/are in power.

You my run with your own definition of communism being of a particular flavor, but you will always face people that do not understand you, because the common definition is not that.

[–] Astroturfed 27 points 1 year ago

The tankies scream real loud that they're communist. So it's pretty easy to get confused.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Absolutely true.

There are, however, for some unfathomable reason, queer tankies. That, I do not understand.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Think of it this way - you're a queer person who has struggled most of your life to feel safe and accepted. Then you meet a community that tells you all transphobes get the firing squad. Suddenly you feel safe, accepted, and like you matter. That emotional contrast is veryy appealing and addicting.

Nevermind that in real life, if you were putting people to the firing squads for as little as saying "neopronouns are stupid" will actually just make the majority of people fear and hate the queer community in the long run.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

and also in real life the soviet union regularly executed queers

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Same type of people as Log Cabin Republicans

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

There were also Jews for Hitler.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Oh yeah, no argument there, just like those log cabin conservatives or whatever, there will always be people who both internalise their own oppression to such a degree, and also have the willingness to step over others to benefit themselves, who will act as "one of the good ones" for the oppressing group, tokens they think will be spared but never are.

[–] SuddenlyBlowGreen 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not if you actually look at communist countries anywhere in the real world.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Hoo boy.

The point being raised, I believe, is that 'communist' countries are generally as 'communist' as they are 'the people's' or 'democratic' - it bears little resemblance to the 19th century theories which spawned the term and which are still in use amongst socialist thinkers today.

[–] SuddenlyBlowGreen 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So you're saying there's no actual communist countries, and this whole this is just theoretical?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

I mean, countries controlled by communist parties themselves would say that. Communist parties generally claim to run a socialist worker's state which will lead to communism.

In reality, it's just a power grab, with little to do with the workers.

There have been socialist polities in the past 100 years, genuinely socialist. None without their faults, but certainly not the totalitarian farce that people think of when they think of communism.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

there's no actual communist countries

Correct.

[–] SuddenlyBlowGreen 4 points 1 year ago (26 children)

Man, that's really convenient.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I recon the Neozapatista communes in Chiapas come pretty close. Historically, Revolutionary Catalonia during the Spanish Civil War, the Makhnovshina during the Russian Civil War, and a couple others also came very close to the definition of communism, although all of them, because they still had to interact with the outside economy, continued to use some form of money.

In the case of the aforementioned historic governments, they met their demise because they relied too heavily on an alliance with tankies, who then proceeded to shoot them in the back. The Neozapatistas did not ally with any authoritarian groups, which is why the sprung up in 1994 in the form of MAREZ and still exist today in the form of GALs.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

Yes, when you actually understand what communism is, and don't play the "the nazis were actually socialists it's in the name" card

https://medium.com/international-workers-press/misconceptions-about-communism-2e366f1ef51f

[–] SuddenlyBlowGreen 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Okay, so give me an actual real communist country where LGBTQ people are treated well and as equals.

the nazis were actually socialists it’s in the name

What the fuck

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

They're mocking that idea about the Nazis, not endorsing it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What the fuck

that's exactly what you're doing.

an authoritarian calling his dictatorship the leftist thing doesn't make it the leftist thing, it just makes it part of a pattern of the power hungry intentionally co-opting of leftist ideas to gain popularity.

As for the first question, if you had followed the conversation at all or bothered reading any of the information I linked you would be able to answer that yourself, and I'm done doing the work for you, if you care, make your own effort to find out.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

https://www.greenleft.org.au/content/zapatistas-gay-rights-let-those-who-persecute-be-ashamed

The Zapatistas have organized a net of interconnected communes in Southern Mexico that have operated independently from the Mexican state since 1994. In these communes, productive property is held in common by the inhabitants. There are no employers or employees. Difference in wealth is negligible. Governance is achieved via participatory democracy. It is as close as you can get to communism when you're still forced to trade with capitalists and thus use money.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)