this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
118 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

59633 readers
4484 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Initially, there will be no need for particle beams/electron microscopy

It sounds like this might never be viable in the consumer space. Pity. The world is more cloud-centered than I'd like as it is. I want 1PB in my pocket!

[–] LazaroFilm 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This also sounds like permanent write memory with real only after that. No re-write.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, the CeraByte web site is suspiciously devoid of any mention of rewrite-ability (or lack thereof). They just mention reading and writing. https://www.cerabyte.com/how-it-works/

More questions than answers, looking through their web site.

After a few minutes of duckduckgoing it, it looks like they are a new company still in the funding phase. They are due to present at the Storage Developer Conference later this month, but I'm not sure they actually have a product yet. https://storagedeveloper.org/events/agenda/session/527

In the abstract they focus on cold storage, but also mention "the ability to fully recycle the media".

[–] SandLight 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

That's not nothing though. Use cases like YouTube or archival work absolutely had a use case for read only

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For sure. Also, if the density is sufficiently high compared to alternatives, it could be objectively better anyway. For instance, a typical SSD is rated for less than 1000 full write cycles. So if I have a write-once media with more than 1000 times the space, I'll be able to write more to it even in the worst-case scenario.

[–] SandLight 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Huh, pair that with some quality memory for indexing and it would be a pretty good home backup device

[–] LazaroFilm 3 points 1 year ago

All you need is an electron beam microscope. Simple home setup. I don’t see this coming to home users in the near and semi- near future.

[–] LazaroFilm 2 points 1 year ago

In the film industry, long term storage of digital films is a real issue. Disney still creates a technicolor (3strip) copy of their films as digital data isn’t as reliable as good old silver emulation.

[–] BURN 1 points 1 year ago

Depending on necessary speed, Tape Drives fit that use case pretty well. This feels like it could be a slight improvement on that format, but it’ll entirely depend on density

[–] BURN 6 points 1 year ago

It makes sense from a layman’s perspective on why it can’t be rewritten, but this is really just a single write storage mechanism. May be really good for archival data, but anything that needs active use is probably far from feasible

[–] Master 7 points 1 year ago

They said the same thong about ssds for mass storage. Granted this tech is dramatically different. But we went from coffee table sized laser disks in the 90s to psp disc's in the 2000s. That's like a 1:100 size reduction and at a 1000 x data storage rate. Who knows what the future stores.