this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
375 points (79.4% liked)

Privacy

32173 readers
444 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Gmail prompt to provide phone number sounds like a threat

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What are you talking about? Google is not encrypting their emails, where did you get that info from?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, this has nothing to do with encryption, it’s because they refuse to have a support division that would be able to get people back into their accounts.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What? No, that's the whole point of 2FA. There is literally no other way to verify authorization otherwise because it's by-default incapable of verifying identity.

Knowing the previous password doesn't help because those are often found in password dumps.

This is true of any email service.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

2FA is just a second password and has nothing to do with encryption. Can simply be removed.

They could bypass this authentication without problems, if they want. I lost my phone and my google business account got restored regardless of 2FA. It's just a button for the support. The problem is the identification, especially of private customers (dunno if they would even do that).

Encryption passwords aren't time-based either, they must be static.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes but that has nothing to do with the data being encrypted and Google not having access to it. Their whole business runs around them having too much access to user data.

And yeah before you say anything, yeah the data is probably encrypted at rest which means nothing in this case.