this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
190 points (97.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4034 readers
100 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

There will be exemptions for legitimate uses of nitrous oxide, for example in medical or catering industries. The gas is commonly used as a painkiller and for producing whipped cream in cooking.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So in other words it isn't even necessarily something they can convict for. Strawberries and whipped cream at the park anyone?

[–] AnyOldName3 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You're going to at least have to be seeing a mate that owns the equipment to use it for cream at the park. If you just stick it in a pot and let rip, you're going to spray non-whipped cream everywhere, which I bet would mean a court wouldn't consider it reasonable doubt.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Does the UK not have a "beyond a reasonable doubt" requirement? How the hell are they going to prove beyond a reasonable doubt it was going to be misused unless they literally witnessed the act? As long as you don't say anything, you could have purchased it for anyone or anything.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're applying brains and logic to a situation where they were never deployed.

There's a fairly high chance that this law will never be enacted anyway. Given the current political situation we may have a new government by February 2024.

[–] AnyOldName3 1 points 1 year ago

The doubt has to be reasonable, and it undermines your defence if you don't answer questions. The prosecutor will ask you what you were going to do with the canister. If you decline to answer, you've not created reasonable doubt. If you say you were going to make whipped cream, there'll be follow-up questions, like whether you had the equipment to do so. If you don't, then it's not reasonable to take your claims at face value, so there isn't reasonable doubt.