Technology

59224 readers

2973 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

304

Tesla is reportedly under investigation by the DOJ and SEC over it's mysterious 'Project 42' (www.businessinsider.com)

submitted 1 year ago by L4s to c/technology

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Tesla is reportedly under investigation by the DOJ and SEC over it's mysterious 'Project 42'::The project was internally believed to involve building a glass house for Elon Musk, the Journal previously reported.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] Caradoc879 -34 points 1 year ago (3 children)

[deleted]

[–] fapforce5 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know, but my best guess would be either it's a publicly traded company and needs to disclose how it spends its money, or that taxes weren't paid for the personal use funds

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Got it in two. Both, per the article:

It can be illegal to use company funds for personal expenses — especially when dealing with a publicly traded company. If a public company were found to have used company funds for an executive's personal use it could lead to an IRS investigation and lawsuits from shareholders.

Elon doesn't own all of Tesla. It's a publicly traded company whose shares are held by millions(?) of people. The board and CEO are generally required to act in those owners' best interests, not their own. They have leeway, but building the CEO a house is a lot closer to embezzlement (taking company funds for personal gain) than say a PR stunt. Board/CEO remuneration is fairly carefully controlled to avoid this kind of thing.

As for tax, it looks like the US is a bit more lax with fringe benefit tax than other jurisdictions, but it could nonetheless apply.

[–] Dntshoot 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So if he were to give himself a bonus and use that money to build the house would it still be illegal? Genuinely asking

[–] dm_me_your_feet 11 points 1 year ago

No CEO of a public company has the power to just "give himself a bonus" if the sum is to be any more than pocket money. The board has to approve it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

The board would need to approve of that bonus, and in turn the board is accountable to shareholders. If a CEO starts using a public company as a personal piggy bank, shareholders have grounds to sue.

[–] suction 10 points 1 year ago

So you didn’t read it