this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
452 points (97.3% liked)
Asklemmy
43989 readers
1562 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Except car pigments? I hear that they are the most expensive.
Thatβs because da red wunz go fasta. Requires extra points to buy, more spensive.
We need da purple wunz! No coppah gettin us in a sneaky kaw!
Didn't realise orkz were car salesmen all along
House paint can use slag from mines, making it a rest product and thus very cheap.
Cars use much fancier stuff.
That's because of our evolutionary desire to look for ripe fruit. So, we want red thing.
Source: idk, heard it sopmewhere
I find that a bit hard to believe, seeing as the paint of a car affects mpg through air resistance, luxury cars often add in glitter, and all of it has to be applied through air brushing
Maybe at one point, but I'd be beyond shocked if red was meaningfully more expensive. There are also the myths that red cars cost more to insure and get pulled over more, like with those myths there might be a tiny kernel of truth, but the statements probably aren't true outside very specific historical conditions