this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
244 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

59483 readers
3823 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (5 children)

As someone who dropped $550 on a 1080 (not Ti) years ago and still using it for VR, I could be tempted to go AMD. Nvidia has gone off the deep end with pricing and I can't see myself going that route. I'm starting to hit some bottleknecks and I'm sure I'll upgrade in the next 3 years.

[–] miketunes_ 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Too bad amd has always lagged in VR performance. Especially if you were trying to do wireless quest, I think the encoding latency was quite a bit higher.

[–] Shrek 6 points 1 year ago

I use an AMD GPU and I stream to my Quest 2 a lot. I've only had one app have issues ever. It was Google Earth VR which I understand that they quit developing. I have never noticed latency either..

load more comments (3 replies)