this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
1426 points (94.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

9802 readers
585 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Image transcript:

Calvin (from Calvin & Hobbes) sitting at a lemonade stand, smiling, with a sign that reads, "Trains and micromobility are inevitably the future of urban transportation, whether society wants it or not. CHANGE MY MIND."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The future of transportation is no transportation.

How many car miles could be saved each year if people didn't have to go to the office to do their jobs? We were already most of the way there.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

That... is silly. Things need to move.

So you expect us to live in a virtual pod with a treadmill and grow all of our own food? And collect rainwater?

Edit: I’m not saying we shouldn’t reduce our need for freight. Growing food in your backyard (half of my yard is good production) reduces the need for freight emissions. And I cycle to work. But drive or fly on holidays, I wish we had a more reliable train network.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They said transporation, not freight. I think they mean you can access everything on foot. But just for your heresay against the pod, your pod was made 10% smaller and your treadmill was made 10% faster.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Freight is just thing transportation, It's a subcategory so it's not like it's not included. It's silly to act like it's stupid to think it is.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

That point maybe wasn't very good, probably saying that offices should be closer (also work from home)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

How far and how often is the key, on a well planned city people should live close to their jobs and recreational areas, taking away people commuting to work and grouping people with similar destinations together you can solve traffic and give people more mobility.

[–] SMITHandWESSON 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Not everyone works in an office. Construction, trades, and utility works still need vehicles to work on and create infrastructure out and indoors.

You'll also have tons of people in rural area like farmers and ranchers that still need vehicles.

That being said most of those vehicles will be electric soon. My company will be moving to electric starting in 3 years.

PS: I'm a utility worker, and we take our work vehicles home foe weather emergencies, so the transportation line is a little blurred for me

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, you still need to transport items, and people that do things with their hands, but surely in most first world countries, these things are a minority of road traffic.

If you can get those chokepoints out the way, from dystopian 10 lane traffic jams to an overcrowded tube train, everything else would run so much smoother.

[–] SMITHandWESSON 2 points 1 year ago

I would totally love not to be in a traffic jam, especially while on the clock as I don't get paid for the drive time to and from work.

[–] uis 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, you still need to transport items,

Well, cargo bikes are a thing. You can transport whole fridge there.

[–] uis 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Construction, trades, and utility works still need vehicles to work on and create infrastructure out and indoors.

That didn't stop people before cars. Back then people built small railways if we are talking about construction.

farmers and ranchers that still need vehicles.

They need specialized equipment. They need heavy equipment.

That being said most of those vehicles will be electric soon.

A car is a car. Another motor doesn't turn car into magic.

[–] jj4211 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That didn't stop people before cars.

Standard of living was much much worse back then.

They need specialized equipment.

They also need to get to stores and see friends and family. Asking people to go back to insular homebound living for farm living seems unreasonable.

Another motor doesn't turn car into magic.

However, if electric, it's no exhaust, options for flexible energy sources, and hopefully long lived and recyclable batteries. If you are more upset about cars getting in the way of walking, then enjoy the walkable communities that exist today. Unfortunately they tend to be pricey.

[–] uis 1 points 1 year ago

They also need to get to stores

Well, ok. On farms cars at least make some sense.

However, if electric, it's no exhaust, options for flexible energy sources, and hopefully long lived and recyclable batteries.

Yes, but they still take space, instane car infrastructure is still there and crashes still happen.

[–] SMITHandWESSON 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That didn't stop people before cars. Back then people built small railways if we are talking about construction.

We wouldn't be having this conversation if it weren't for vehicles like mine keeping up the internet infrastructure up.

There's also no fucking way you going to put train tracks everywhere to keep up infrastructure. That sounds really fucking stupid

They need specialized equipment. They need heavy equipment.

This statement makes me feel like I'm responding to a 14 yr old with no life experience. Not even going to bother answering it.

A car is a car. Another motor doesn't turn car into magic.

Electric vehicles have no emissions so there's no reason people can't use them specifically for work.

PS: You can respond but I'm not going to bother with you. There's no point in having a discussion with someone with illrational and militant about their ideals

[–] uis 1 points 1 year ago

There's also no fucking way you going to put train tracks everywhere to keep up infrastructure.

There's also no fucking way you going to put ashphalt everywhere to keep up infrastructure.

That sounds really fucking stupid

Yep. Didn't stop from building roads.

Electric vehicles have no emissions so there's no reason people can't use them specifically for work.

You are correct, vehicles. Car is not the only type of vehicle, it's one of many. And what I was saying emissions is not the only problem of car.

You can respond but I'm not going to bother with you

Ok.

There's no point in having a discussion with someone with illrational and militant about their ideals

Indeed. See, there are topics we agree upon.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What about groceries, various errands? it's definitely not just going to the office is the only reason people get around with cars.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Basically in countries with more micromobility, they have smaller grocery stores. There will be one on every corner and you can just walk to it.

I see you mentioned suburbs. Yeah. The thing keeping shops and homes far apart in that case is zoning laws. And also building code dictating single family housing. In a more dense suburb in amsterdam or chicago you might have some rowhouse apartments but the first floor will be for shops, and one of those shops willcbe your nearest grocery store.

[–] uis 1 points 1 year ago

Trains(or cargo trams if you want fancy) for delivery to store and your eleven for delivery from store to home. Or ebike. Or bus.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a discussion about the bulk of transport and commutes. Distributors don't need to follow a centralised system.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You still need to drive to do all these things, that's often a considerable distance though if you live in suburban areas since everything is far away.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One argument that keeps coming up in favor of cars that the United States is big. Well, if it’s big, we have plenty of room to build things close to where people live. It’s only zoning laws that force things to be unnecessarily far away.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes that was my point, not that we need cargo trams.

And it's not just US that has this issue although there is taken to the extreme.

Many suburban areas in Europe have the same issues but the advantage is that many of them were built around small villages that they have ballooned so there was something that could give local services for residents already.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Good point! I usually hear sincere arguments that we have to drive because everything is so far apart, and so I took it the wrong way. My apologies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You make a good point but it's hard to agree. I don't like home, and would prefer not to work in my own home. I want to see the world, I like to travel. Perhaps if my life had more social mobility I wouldn't be so starved for literal mobility. I have a car, could go drive anywhere. But it's not real freedom.

[–] kerrypacker 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These are the jobs AI will replace first.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

LLMs are not AI.

If you can train an AI to take the stream of nonsense I am given on a daily basis, and not only turn it into software but also the software they needed rather than what they actually described, then that AI is fucking welcome to my job...