this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
84 points (100.0% liked)
United States | News & Politics
7576 readers
120 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So probably minimal impact. It seems weird that it's so divisive then. How about no federal requirements or restrictions on leaded fuel for aircraft, but instead throw on a tax to encourage switching? That sounds pretty reasonable to me, and given that the environmental impact is pretty low, that's about all the government should need to do.
It was a problem for cars because of how many there were, but I'm not aware of any issues with the scale of these aircraft. But maybe I'm missing something.
They doing rebates for gas stoves in Florida.
What does this have to do with leaded fuel in aircraft?
Tax incentive to switch the bad way.