this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
1801 points (98.7% liked)
Technology
58473 readers
4798 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's purely about control. WFH is cheaper and more efficient.
WFH being taken from folks is just about real estate. Yet another reason why capitalism is gonna kill us all. You know how you get a bunch of cars off of the road? WFH.
There are three other options:
Those things are fine, but don't negate the problem of pointlessly being required to travel to a pointless office.
I don't negate, but this also solves how to travel to relatives.
You’re not wrong but all those things require costly infrastructure changes whereas many jobs can be wfh right now with no upfront cost required.
Both would be cool though
Third option does not require new infrastructure even if you don't have PT. Just make city-wide limit in 30 km/h, then maybe ban cars.
Control or real estate. ¿Por qué no los dos?
Capitalism is gonna save us.