this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
787 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

59641 readers
4731 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

OpenAI now tries to hide that ChatGPT was trained on copyrighted books, including J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter series::A new research paper laid out ways in which AI developers should try and avoid showing LLMs have been trained on copyrighted material.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] assassin_aragorn 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Except the massive corporations and entities are the ones getting rich on this. They're seeking to exploit the work of authors and musicians and artists.

Respecting the intellectual property of creative workers is the anti corporate position here.

[–] uis 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except corporations have infinitely more resources(money, lawyers) compared to people who create. Take Jarek Duda(mathematician from Poland) and Microsoft as an example. He created new compression algorythm, and Microsoft came few years later and patented it in Britain AFAIK. To file patent contest and prior art he needs 100k£.

[–] assassin_aragorn 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think there's an important distinction to make here between patents and copyright. Patents are the issue with corporations, and I couldn't care less if AI consumed all that.

[–] uis 2 points 1 year ago

And for copyright there is no possible way to contest it. Also when copyright expires there is no guarantee it will be accessable by humanity. Patents are bad, copyright even worse.

[–] uis 0 points 1 year ago

There is nothing anti corporate if result can be alienated.

[–] Touching_Grass -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Large number of these Artist, musicians and authors is corporate America today. And those authors artists and musicians have exploited all our spaces for far too long. Most of the internet had been turned toxic due to their greed. I wish they take their content and go find their own spaces instead of mooching off everybody else's. These LLMs are only doing what they've done

[–] assassin_aragorn 2 points 1 year ago

I'm sorry, what?