this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
135 points (79.2% liked)

Asklemmy

44151 readers
1336 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Telegram is just actually superior in terms of features I don't get it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Asudox 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Why do people choose Telegram over Signal? Signal encrypts everything by default, unlike Telegram which only "encrypts" messages in a (iirc) secure or secret chat. Fortunately, EU is forcing all major gatekeepers' messaging apps to be able to communicate with other messaging apps. I, finally, will be able to break free from WhatsApp and use Signal. Uninstalling WhatsApp and requesting for a deletion of my account; a dream come true soon.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Why use Signal over XMPP and Matrix? Signal is centralized and wants you to stay in check, using their crappy client, giving away your phone number, and all your presence, social graph and other privacy sensitive information to a single actor (which can't be yourself, because you can't self host signal) and that has nothing to back it up other than "trust me bro, I'm gonna do no harm, but also I control all your communications under my own terms and conditions and there's nothing you can do about it".

[–] Asudox 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Matrix was found leaking metadata, it's not like Matrix is bad or anything. But it just doesn't get the attention it needs. For WhatsApp users that do want better privacy and security, Signal is a solid choice. XMPP, by default with no configuration doesn't really have encryption and also, it has issues with metadata leakage as well.

For the average joe, Signal is a simple app that has privacy and security out of the box. Sure, it would be awesome if Matrix was widely adopted, but it isn't.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What Matrix metadata leakage are you talking about? Regarding XMPP, I am not aware of anything like it, and I suspect that this leakage you are talking about is just standard client-server signaling, where in federated protocols like Matrix and XMPP you can chose whom to trust (or self-host) whereas in all other cases your metadata isn't just centralized and consolidated, you have no recourse and knowledge about what's being done with it.

On the side of XMPP, OMEMO (which is XMPP's take on double ratchet encryption Γ  la Signal) is standard across the board of all maintained clients, so you wouldn't be less secure there than on e.g. Signal or Telegram, so your take on XMPP's security isn't factual.

[–] Asudox 2 points 1 year ago

Huh, some things might have changed then. My memory is from around 2021-2022, so things might have changed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Signal is an installable App from an app store.. Where's your matrix and xmpp? That's why they use it over element/etc

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Matrix and XMPP have plenty of apps installable from those stores as well, not sure what your argument is about?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Their names are not matrix or xmpp... It's not as easy as saying "Install Signal" is my point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

that's not even true, if you search "matrix", element is your first result, if you type XMPP, you get "Conversations", exactly as you would expect.

[–] max 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if you type XMPP, you get "Conversations"

Which is a €4 app. Also, Signal is 4th in the results.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yep, that's more or less how much WhatsApp was costing you before you became the product. That didn't prevent it getting millions of users.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

XMPP arguably has some of of the strongest crypto functionality there is, it's just too dependent on the app to feel safe, since all of the vulnerabilities in these ecosystems are basically down to the client implementation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Absolutely, and an argument can be made about captive ecosystems controlling both clients and servers. They also represent a single point of failure, so there's no magic bullet. In practice it's also not that different than keeping up with your browser's/OS'/phone's updates and XMPP has that for itself that it has (unlike Matrix) a vibrant community of clients and servers supported by diverse parties (commercial and not).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When talking about messaging apps, you've to use the one that's easiest to use even for the most noob tech person.

Signal uses phone number, because that's how people generally communicate. It's easy to use, setup. No privacy nightmares compared to WhatsApp, or security nightmares compared to Telegram (where E2EE is not even on by default). It's open source, regularly audited and can be used on any device (no more proprietary green bubble nonsense). There's still a market for Threema and Matrix, etc. It just never will be mainstream.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

No privacy nightmares compared to WhatsApp

My whole point was that between Signal and WhatsApp, none is intrinsically better than the other in this regard. Both are centralized and collect the same amount of privacy-sensitive data about you (your online presence and patterns, your IP, your network graph, the routing of your messages and their nature…), because they need that to function. Whether they log it (irrespective of what they advertise) is one thing nobody but themselves can verify and where opensource plays no role.

Matrix/XMPP are only better because you can self-host if you trust no one, or choose whom to trust, or change whom to trust along the way without incurring a total loss of your contacts, histories, assets, …

IMO, the sales pitch for XMPP/Matrix shouldn't be "we are better/more secure/more privacy focused by design" (and it's pretty clear that the tech-illiterate majority doesn't care anyway), it should be "with us, you will no longer have to jump ship every 5 years in avg. because facebook/google/amazon/some oligarch/… broke their promise/used their absolute power over your account to their discretion".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because one is an app and the others are a technology standard. I can install Signal on my phone and use it to talk to people securely.

Where do I go to get XMPP or Matrix? Can I trust app makers to have correctly implemented the protocols? When it comes to security I tend to trust larger entities versus the garage startup.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

While that's a fair point, element.io is the defacto matrix implementation and effectively the group that started matrix.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

9 People don't care about encryption but care about custom stickers, convinient search, everything fancy that's not privacy