this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
345 points (89.8% liked)

politics

19239 readers
2601 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

ABCnews

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Clent -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Shitty click bait making him sound like a dead beat dad.

It's almost entirely unpaid taxes

[–] Zaktor 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

While it's true the lion's share is unpaid taxes, he owes $50k in child support. I'd still call that a deadbeat dad.

[–] Clent -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's difficult to know without more details. Consider how much non w-2 income is required to owe that much in tax. 50k could be from a couple missed monthly payments

[–] Zaktor 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It would take an income of hundreds of thousands of dollars PER MONTH to have child support that high. And regardless of how quickly they accumulated, that debt was generated in 2003. That's TWO DECADES of not paying a pretty significant childcare debt. There's no way to brush that aside as no big deal.

[–] Clent 1 points 1 year ago

Ok. Missed that part. Unless he paid it with out notifying the court (but then why not say so now) he's likely owes more because of fees and whatever they tack on.

My point was mainly how being a tax cheat is considered a big brain move by a non-insignificant number of voters.

Being a dead beat dad isn't that big of a turn off for a subset of those.

Hell I didn't even know he was running. This is free campaign press. I can only see it helping his poll numbers.

[–] aidan -2 points 1 year ago

Honestly for unpaid child support it depends on the situation.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Clent 5 points 1 year ago

A good chunk of the country thinks be a tax cheat is smart.

I don't agree. It's free loading. But as evidence from other comments here, it makes him a hero to those who are anti-tax.