this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
473 points (95.4% liked)

Canada

7273 readers
569 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


๐Ÿ’ต Finance, Shopping, Sales


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The answer is in the article: โ€œ I donโ€™t want to say that there are necessarily equivalent health risks,โ€

[โ€“] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I would argue the overwhelming majority of consumers do not know alcohol is a proven carcinogen, and many would still choose to make more health conscious choices, even though the relative risk is lower than smoking.

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While alcohol is a carcinogen, it only accounts for something like 3% of cancers deaths, mostly paired with liver disease. Hell, breathing air in a city causes more cancer deaths than alcohol.

This whole article reads like a modern temperance movement, trying to stamp out vice by comparing one harm to another, despite how different the harms are.

We know the harms of alcohol, they are different than the harms of tobacco. They should not be regulated the same. This article misses that completely.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Being a carcinogen is alcohols minor side effect. Don't forget alcohol poisoning and the damage it does to families and relationships due to alcoholism, and another biggie, driving under the influence.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yes

We know the harms of alcohol, they are different than the harms of tobacco. They should not be regulated the same. This article misses that completely.

I just didn't list out the harms of alcohol, or how they're regulated, because I thought everyone knew.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He clearly didn't forget, unless you think tobacco also carries the same family and relationship damage and driving under the influence problems?

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The list of proven and likely carcinogens is rather large. Do we put a similar health warning on every sausage and strip of bacon? Plus planks of wood (wood dust contains known carcinogen). If you extend the list to mutagens, rather than proven carciogens the list gets even longer