this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
1610 points (98.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

32710 readers
258 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] douglasg14b 113 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (19 children)

So, essentially, really poorly written malware? Given the number of assumptions it makes without any sort of robustness around system configuration it's about as good as any first-pass bash script.

It'd be a stretch to call it malware, it's probably an outright fabrication to call it a virus.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 years ago (8 children)

So you’re saying it’s about as robust as a typical Linux application then?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Packagers job to make it fit their distro, innit?

[–] GentooPhysicist 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

As a package maintainer, it's a lot of fun sometimes!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I bet, both ironically and genuinely, depending on the cade. Flatpak must feel like a godsend to a lot of people haha

[–] GentooPhysicist 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I've actually never used flatpak, I still prefer distro-specific package managers

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Username checks out

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Flatpak is really nice imo. You can have stable distro with up-to-date apps. And sandboxing for proprietary stuff, which is really nice.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)