this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
543 points (96.4% liked)

Selfhosted

40259 readers
1108 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In the past two weeks I set up a new VPS, and I run a small experiment. I share the results for those who are curious.

Consider that this is a backup server only, meaning that there is no outgoing traffic unless a backup is actually to be recovered, or as we will see, because of sshd.

I initially left the standard "port 22 open to the world" for 4-5 days, I then moved sshd to a different port (still open to the whole world), and finally I closed everything and turned on tailscale. You find a visualization of the resulting egress traffic in the image. Different colors are different areas of the world. Ignore the orange spikes which were my own ssh connections to set up stuff.

Main points:

  • there were about 10 Mb of egress per day due just to sshd answering to scanners. Not to mention the cluttering of access logs.

  • moving to a non standard port is reasonably sufficient to avoid traffic and log cluttering even without IP restrictions

  • Tailscale causes a bit of traffic, negligible of course, but continuous.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] False 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

10mb is pretty much nothing. May as well just use Fail2Ban.

[–] Cybermass 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But it depends on the size of the network/system and how many devices have an open port and are open to connection.

It may not make a difference on 1 server, but if you have a full network with managed switches, routers, firewalls and access points would its impact become more significant?

Not a network expert, just a technician, and I'm curious so any insight is appreciated!

[–] False 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Only Internet facing devices would see this kind of traffic 10mb/day/per public IP address is still nothing unless you otherwise have essentially zero traffic. Typically only firewalls would have external IPs of the devices you mentioned and they wouldn't have SSH bound to an external port

If you're going to have lots of hosts running SSH you should setup a bastion/jump host for it anyways.

[–] aesir 1 points 1 year ago

Well nothing compared to rest of the infrastructure, we are talking of 0.05$ per month per machine at standard egress rates of major cloud providers. Still, why having them?

[–] DoomBot5 1 points 1 year ago

This would be per public address. Generally you'll keep those to a minimum for a properly configured cloud setup, and only have 1-5 of them for a local setup.