this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
31 points (97.0% liked)
worldnews
4867 readers
1 users here now
Rules:
-
Be civil. Disagreements happen, that does not give you the right to personally insult each other.
-
No racism or bigotry.
-
Posts from sources that aren't known to be incredibly biased for either side of the spectrum are preferred. If this is not an option, you may post from whatever source you have as long as it is relevant to this community.
-
Post titles should be the same as the article title.
-
No spam, self-promotion, or trolling.
Instance-wide rules always apply.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
China doesn't want it to be weak, tho.
A country without an economy to backup its war goals will always be weak. I couldn't dream to know what China hopes to achieve by playing both sides. I'm guessing they have multiple goals. Goals such as the feasibility of a Taiwan invasion or perhaps to pick at the corpse of a rotting Russia.
It's all possible, but I feel like Russia's actions and results aren't what they liked. They themselves has a monicker 'paper tiger', and their ally being disabled by their own corruption sets a ground to question if China even a power to respect on the world stage. A second-hand humiliation, and I don't think it can be outweighted by spoils they can get from Russia now. China seems to care about these things.
That's a very good point. Second-hand embarrassment hadn't crossed my mind. Perhaps they might be trying to decrease that risk by pretending to be arbiters. Though indeed that can only be propaganda for their own citizens and closest allies because nobody else is buying that bs. But nothing new there.