this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
155 points (97.5% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29163 readers
156 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news ๐Ÿ˜

Outages ๐Ÿ”ฅ

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to [email protected] e-mail.

Report contact

Donations ๐Ÿ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud
lwadmin
lwCET
jelloeater85
Serinus
lw_mod_notification
155
Why lemmy.world should not defederate from beehaw.org. (self.lemmyworld)
submitted 2 years ago by FantasticFox to c/lemmyworld
193 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

What defederating would mean:

  • We won't see beehaw.org posts/comments on other instances.

Pros:

  • There is less confusion, you can't respond to a beehaw.org user, thinking they will be able to see your response when in reality they cannot.

Cons:

  • We won't be able to see any beehaw.org comments/posts on other instances, so we will miss out on some comment threads and posts. It could be good to be able to see them and interact with the other users there even though beehaw.org users won't see any of our content.

Summary

Overall, I think it is better not to defederate, but simply unsubscribe from all of their communities (and as we no longer get posts from their instance, with time these will cease to appear on our 'front page').

beehaw.org users already can't see our posts/comments anywhere so it's not like defederating would change their experience in any way, so it wouldn't really be retaliation and would just limit the content available to lemmy.world users.

What do you think?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

That's not what's happening at all. They have site rules. Remotr users aren't following them, and aren't beholden to them. Why should they continue to federated with instances that have incompatible rules?

That's not "burn[ing] the whole thing down". That's community management.

The other side of federation is that instances are communities in their own right. And you don't get to show up in someone else's yard, shit in their pool, and then expect to be invited back.

[โ€“] nivenkos 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

But they can ban those users, exactly the same as they ban users on their own instance.

[โ€“] AFKBRBChocolate 3 points 2 years ago

exactly the same as they ban users on their own instance

No, they can't, that's the point. On their own instance, there's an approval process for new users, and so it's much harder and slower for a banned user to come back with a different account. On the two instances they defederated from, new user registration is instant and automatic, so if you ban one of those users, they can be back in seconds on another account.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Not if they can't keep up with them. And if the trolls and bad actors are mostly coming from the same 2 or 3 places, why wouldn't you just block those 2 or 3 places?

You can step on each individual ant that walks through your door, or you can get better door seals.