The theory that many people feel the work they do is pointless because their jobs are "bullshit" has been confirmed by a new study.
The research found that people working in finance, sales and managerial roles are much more likely than others on average to think their jobs are useless or unhelpful to others.
The study, by Simon Walo, of Zurich University, Switzerland, is the first to give quantitative support to a theory put forward by the American anthropologist David Graeber in 2018 that many jobs were "bullshit"—socially useless and meaningless.
Researchers had since suggested that the reason people felt their jobs were useless was solely because they were routine and lacked autonomy or good management rather than anything intrinsic to their work, but Mr. Walo found this was only part of the story.
He analyzed survey data on 1,811 respondents in the U.S. working in 21 types of jobs, who were asked if their work gave them "a feeling of making a positive impact on community and society" and "the feeling of doing useful work."
The American Working Conditions Survey, carried out in 2015, found that 19% of respondents answered "never" or "rarely" to the questions whether they had "a feeling of making a positive impact on community and society" and "of doing useful work" spread across a range of occupations.
Mr. Walo adjusted the raw data to compare workers with the same degree of routine work, job autonomy and quality of management, and found that in the occupations Graeber thought were useless, the nature of the job still had a large effect beyond these factors.
Those working in business and finance and sales were more than twice as likely to say their jobs were socially useless than others. Managers were 1.9 more likely to say this and office assistants 1.6 times.
"David Graeber's 'bullshit jobs' theory claims that some jobs are in fact objectively useless, and that these are found more often in certain occupations than in others," says the study, published in the journal Work, Employment and Society.
"Graeber hit a nerve with his statement. His original article quickly became so popular that within weeks it was translated into more than a dozen languages and reprinted in different newspapers around the world.
"However, the original evidence presented by Graeber was mainly qualitative, which made it difficult to assess the magnitude of the problem.
"This study extends previous analyses by drawing on a rich, under-utilized dataset and provides new evidence.
"It finds that working in one of the occupations highlighted by Graeber significantly increases the probability that workers perceive their jobs as socially useless, compared to all others. This article is therefore the first to find quantitative evidence supporting Graeber's argument."
Law was the only occupation cited by Graeber as useless where Mr. Walo found no statistically significant evidence that staff found their jobs meaningless.
Mr. Walo also found that the share of workers who consider their jobs socially useless is higher in the private sector than in the non-profit or the public sector.
More information: Simon Walo, "Bullshit" After All? Why People Consider Their Jobs Socially Useless, Work, Employment and Society (2023). DOI: 10.1177/09500170231175771
Those have the lowest rate of perceived uselessness out of all the categories measured here by a significant margin
I would say repair is the most important one there and dont under stand why they feel the job is useless. Like phone repair etc I can understand as most people buy a new phone. But building repairs and electrical etc are some of the most important things now
Engineering was at about double what I expected it to be for similar reasons.
Sure, when you compare it to something like sales or office work, there's going to be a significant difference.
But the fact that 1/10 healthcare professionals feel that their work is “pointless” is upsetting, since they can quite literally save someone's life with the work they do.
We need to let more doctors, nurses, therapists, and social workers know how important they are.
I burnt out of healthcare because I felt useless, and here's why:
You can be the absolute best doctor, nurse, medical technician, etc. every single day for your career, but for most patients it's not going to make any difference for them. Because of systemic failures it was a daily churn of patients presenting with conditions that should have been treated ages ago, but they couldn't afford to. It was because of systemic failings that the overhwming majority of patients' conditions were caused by unhealthy lifestyles.
We could stabalize a diabetic today, but they'll try stretching their insulin again as soon as an unexpected expense necessitates it. We could perform a bypass today, but the patient who has eaten fast-food their entire life is unlikely to change their diet now.
I burnt out from being on the front-lines dealing with societal issues, and being powerless to affect corporate and government policies that need to change to actually help patients. We don't need a new drug, or new technology to drastically improve health outcomes for all Americans, we need policy change such as Medicare for All.
I'm so sorry to hear that, and it really is a shame for everyone that these situations exist.
I'm in Canada, so our healthcare system is a little different, but still a challenge. Our nurses and doctors were burning out over the pandemic, and as it turns out, our provincial government underspent by hundreds of millions of dollars during that time. Many left healthcare because of it.
But I can also understand how frustrating it must be when lifestyle related illness keeps people sick, and there's very little you can do to actually help someone with those habits.
From a patient's perspective, I can assure you that I owe more than I could ever repay to my doctors and nurses, and I hope that they know how valued their work is.