this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
94 points (92.0% liked)

Games

31407 readers
1762 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The new update for The Lord of the Rings: Gollum one of the lowest rated games of the year includes bug fixes and progression crashes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Esjee 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Would be amazing to see it get the No Man's Sky treatment

[–] CharlestonChewbacca 31 points 1 year ago

I don't even think that would help... I mean, the concept and design is bad from the outset. It's not just the execution that was bad.

[–] ArchmageAzor 21 points 1 year ago

The difference is NMS always had a solid concept

[–] legion 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even if you fix Gollum, all you're gonna get is a generic 3rd person action-adventure game. We got this game about a hundred times in the Xbox/PS2 era.

No Man's Sky was worth salvaging because it did something mechanically different. Gollum is like if you took one of those PS2 Harry Potter games, dropped it into UE4, and changed which licensed property the game uses.

[–] kaitco 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but PS1 era Chamber of Secrets was tight. I’d play the mess out of that with upgrades graphics.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

10 years from now the entire world economy is surrounding around Gollum. Everybody are having their own Gollum avatars and own precious properties in the game.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree, seeing Gollum start his journey across space to start a completely different game would be quite an improvement.

[–] Alteon -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I refuse to even touch No Man's Sky. I'm sure the game is fine at this point, but I refuse to support a company that thought they could get away with what they attempted to do. Just like KSP2 - sure, they labeled it "Early Access" but they charged full game prices for that thing back in February. It's been half a year later, and there has been literal zero movement on their release roadmap.

[–] Esjee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's KSP?

NMS was developed by a very small studio. Even though they fucked up, they kept on developing the game instead of just ditching it. Everything they add to the game is free and they delivered on most if not all of their promises.

Cyberpunk on the other hand...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

KSP is Kerbal Space Program. The first one released a few years ago and the second one has been on the radar for a while.

Personally I won't buy KSP2, the publisher apparently took over the studio at some point and decided to fire all original employees.