this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
3 points (80.0% liked)
Meta (slrpnk.net)
28 readers
3 users here now
Here we can discuss anything about this Lemmy instance/server itself.
Our XMPP support chat: Movim or XMPP client.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Okay, good to know. The issue is still happening. Also when you say the "full URL" and "search bar", there are number of things that could mean:
To use one community I'm having the issue with as an example, the full URL could be any of:
https://slrpnk.net/c/[email protected]
[email protected]
https://sh.itjust.works/c/iracing
And by "search bar", it seems you could mean my browser's search bar, or the search bar on this webpage, which is effectively the slrpnk.net search bar.
Putting any of the URLs into the slrpnk.net search bar yields nothing. Using the slrpnk.net URL yields the problem I'm experiencing, and the sh.itjust.works URL shows the posts that I can't see using the other URL, but obviously I'm not logged in there.
It seems as though after a little while the error stops popping up, but it took hours at least, not seconds.
Sh.itjust.works has been down for quite some time recently. Maybe you just happened to test it then?
For me putting the original URL into the searchbar of slrpnk.net works everytime, so I don't know how to answer your question otherwise.
Hm, looks like we're having different experiences then. I'm on Windows Firefox, not sure how else to describe all the myriad ways it could be different.
Although testing it just now, I got the problem of seeing no posts via slrpnk and all the posts from the instance url directly.
Also the slrpnk.net search seems to yield very little most of the time. I wonder if there's an issue with my browser.
You can try https://search-lemmy.com/ instead.
I posted the solution and tagged you. Just one last question though, do you get notifications on posts if you're tagged like it used to work on reddit?
Yes although it Is a bit nitpicky about the exact syntax for tagging, so it is easy to get wrong.
Okay, great, I used the autocomplete feature that the browser has, so that should be good enough in general.