Daystrom Institute

675 readers

2 users here now

Welcome to Daystrom Institute!

Serious, in-depth discussion about Star Trek from both in-universe and real world perspectives.

Read more about how to comment at Daystrom.

Rules

1. Explain your reasoning

All threads and comments submitted to the Daystrom Institute must contain an explanation of the reasoning put forth.

2. No whinging, jokes, memes, and other shallow content.

This entire community has a “serious tag” on it. Shitposts are encouraged in Risa.

3. Be diplomatic.

Participate in a courteous, objective, and open-minded fashion. Be nice to other posters and the people who make Star Trek. Disagree respectfully and don’t gatekeep.

4. Assume good faith.

Assume good faith. Give other posters the benefit of the doubt, but report them if you genuinely believe they are trolling. Don’t whine about “politics.”

5. Tag spoilers.

Historically Daystrom has not had a spoiler policy, so you may encounter untagged spoilers here. Ultimately, avoiding online discussion until you are caught up is the only certain way to avoid spoilers.

6. Stay on-topic.

Threads must discuss Star Trek. Comments must discuss the topic raised in the original post.

Episode Guides

The /r/DaystromInstitute wiki held a number of popular Star Trek watch guides. We have rehosted them here:

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

The Federation should not have been surprised that their holograms developed sapience (self.daystrominstitute)

submitted 1 year ago by T156 to c/[email protected]

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

We already know from TOS that Mutlitronic computers are able to develop sapience, with the M-5 computer being specifically designed to "think and reason" like a person, and built around Dr Daystrom's neural engrams.

However, we also know from Voyager that the holomatrix of their Mk 1 EMH also incorporates Multitronic technology, and from DS9 that it's also used in mind-reading devices.

Assuming that the EMH is designed to more or less be a standard hologram with some medical knowledge added in, it shouldn't have come as a surprise that holograms were either sapient themselves, or were capable of developing sapience. It would only be a logical possibility if technology that allowed human-like thought and reasoning into a hologram.

If anything, it is more of a surprise that sapient holograms like the Doctor or Moriarty hadn't happened earlier.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

[deleted]

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

In this case, 'sapience' is correct. However, I don't recall them ever making a distinction, in-universe, between the two.

The main difference between sentience and sapience is self-awareness. A sentient being has consciousness, the capacity for sensation, and a subjective experience. Many animals can be described as sentient, although it’s hard to know for sure what’s going on inside a fish’s head. Sapience, on the other hand, is marked by a higher level of cognition and intelligence. Human beings are sapient creatures.

[–] T156 2 points 1 year ago

In this case, ‘sapience’ is correct. However, I don’t recall them ever making a distinction, in-universe, between the two.

Not as far as I'm aware. TOS did seem to make more of a distinction between the two, but TNG treated them as one and the same, with most other series following suit.

[–] T156 4 points 1 year ago

No, sapience would be the right word in this case. Sentience is more for general self-awareness, whereas Sapience is more for human-like intelligence, which the Doctor (and Moriarty) express.