this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
172 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

59470 readers
4918 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] markr 96 points 1 year ago (35 children)

Mass transit should be free.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fare evasion is like stealing bread. It's a crime of desperation.

This kind of budgetary indulgence only indicates the MTA doesn't much like the public of the city it serves.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Nah definitely not. If you're that desperate where are you even going on the subway? I've literally seen homeless people pay the fare. The only time I'd consider it justifiable is if you're in a rush, the train is right their, and your payment isn't working. Otherwise like what, where you gonna go and what you gonna do if you can't even afford $2.75?

[–] irotsoma 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it was free, conservatives would put more effort into killing it off like they did in the 60s and 70s when they killed off trains and subways in a bunch of cities, killed off the trolley systems in several cities, etc. Otherwise their donors would lose too much money on people switching from driving. But yeah, it's almost entirely funded by taxes anyway. Would be logical to make it 100% funded, but keeping a small fare keeps it a smaller target of conservatives.

[–] markr 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes bad actors are always a problem. So I guess we should never do anything substantial to reform the system because rightwing shitheads will try to sabotage it.

[–] irotsoma 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't say that. It's just that first we need to fix the election system that is totally broken through gerrymandering, funding cuts, re-expanding mail in voting and early voting, making election day a mandatory holiday for all but emergency services, get the big money out of politics by removing personhood from corporations and thus removing their "right to free speech" as well as their ability to donate unlimited funds through various means and possibly even making all election ads paid for by public funds that are equally distributed if requested, etc. Then once everyone can vote without losing their job for having to take off almost an entire day and they can vote for local politicians rather than ones that will mostly be responsible for conservative areas connected to their sliver of the city, we need to organize progressive people to actually do it. But I think once it becomes apparent that their votes actually have some chance of making a difference, it won't be as hard as it is now.

[–] markr 2 points 1 year ago

Oh sure yeah lol none of this is realistic as our election system, and our representation system are massively defective, and of course a lot of people have lost their fucking minds.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe they should start electing people to charge property taxes correctly to those ultra luxury condos.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

America won't achieve that with such low tax rates

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Mass transit barely exists in most of America.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes. Interestingly US taxes aren't even low if you factor in what you have to pay for directly, compared to what other countries pay though taxes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol have you seen the taxes in the US

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's like 5% federal only in some states

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Crisps 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Local mass transit should be free. It is already really heavily subsidized, often almost entirely subsidized, so it wouldn’t cost as much as you think.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Mass transit cannot be free.

It should however be without toll. It can quite reasonably be funded with tax.

But free? No. Someone somewhere has to pay for the infrastructure and operations.

[–] markr 32 points 1 year ago

Free to use, funded by taxes. Like how healthcare should work.

[–] T156 10 points 1 year ago

This seems like needless nitpicking. The end result is the same, it's still free at the point of use.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Free as in free to use. Just like roads.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] nomadjoanne 1 points 1 year ago

I'm curious how much of the budget is covered by fares. I think here in Europe it tends to be roughly 50%. But the trains are much better than NYC and the fares are cheaper.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)