Technology

59652 readers

2664 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

846

After Raising $235K, Abode Remains Committed to Taking on Adobe (petapixel.com)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/technology

147 comments fedilink hide all child comments

TL;DR:

Semple, a multi-disciplinary British artist, promised to build “a brand new suite of world-class design and photography tools, with an uncanny similarity to the tools you’ve been indoctrinated in.”

“There’s a really urgent need for a suite of creative tools for creators that they actually own rather than rent. In a way, this first started when Adobe and Pantone decided to paywall the Pantone colors and I created Freetone — which was a free color plugin so creators could continue to access their palette,” he says.

“I have lawyers, and I’ve taken advice. We have solid plans in place. I would also point out that nobody has seen the final branding and no software that infringes on any of Adobe’s trademarks has been produced,”

“I have successfully challenged IP owned by Tiffany and Co, Pantone, Mattel, and others over the years. I feel we have a good and thorough understanding of where the legal line is and an ability to get as close to that as possible without overstepping it.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] [email protected] -55 points 1 year ago (7 children)

What? If you require a hammer to do work you refuse to pay for hammer?

[–] tomthegeek 48 points 1 year ago

A subscription isn't buying a hammer. A subscription is buying access to a hammer. Access that can be revoked at any time. That's not very reliable.

[–] MrLuemasG 29 points 1 year ago

If you require a hammer to do work, you just buy a hammer that you can use for the rest of time or until you buy a better hammer.

You don't pay $10 dollars a month for the rest of time for the same hammer you could have just paid for previously. Especially since HammerCo might up the price, go out of business, or flat out stop offering the hammer subscription you rely on, and you lose access to your vital resource.

What a dumb argument.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

When you shove crayons up your nose and you're only paying a subscription for those crayons, you're going to have to return the crayons after the subscription ends

But see if you bought those crayons, you could leave them up there as long as you'd like.

[–] elscallr 14 points 1 year ago

I'm not buying a hammer subscription

[–] Throwaway4669332255 8 points 1 year ago

I buy a hammer. I don't want to depend on another company for my hammer to work.

[–] steakmeout 4 points 1 year ago

Subscribe to go fuck your dumb analogy.

[–] LifeInOregon 1 points 1 year ago

I buy a hammer. I don’t rent it. When I buy a hammer I pay up front for the one I’m getting and keep it until it breaks or I replace it (and even when I replace it I likely keep the old one). I’ve got four hammers that I’ve had for between 20 and 4 years. And I paid for each of them once.