Narrow Community. Political science and adjacent disciplines

121 readers

1 users here now

The goal of this community is to educate everyone (and ourselves) by sharing the articles, books and general knowledge about politics and society.

Named after a book "The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty"

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

qnick

Is there a way to encourage coalitions larger than a simple majority? (lemmy.sdf.org)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/narrow

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Right now there's an incentive to juuust hit a majority in order to maximize a party's own appointments, so political systems with high fragmentation have government stability problems. Would there be a way to work around this? Could a parliament maybe do some of the work of a government directly, for example?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh no. Party list systems have it bad, or at least Israel and the Netherlands do. When there's double-digit competing parties coalitions get huge, and if they're right near 50% it only takes 1 to pull the plug.

In FPTP there's usually no fragmentation to start with because only 2 parties can dominate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you saying FPTP is a fairer system?. Honest question. I don't understand your overall statement I guess.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, FPTP just has different issues. Like unrepresentitiveness, which as a minority voter in a safe riding I personally hate. Or the fact that if something goes wrong with your 2 parties it's really bad (cough America cough).

Some of those party list countries in practice have a snap election like every year, for reference. Otherwise it sounds great.