this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
1155 points (91.8% liked)

Technology

57513 readers
4753 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Starting August 7th, advertisers that haven’t reached certain spending thresholds will lose their official brand account verification. According to emails obtained by the WSJ, brands need to have spent at least $1,000 on ads within the prior 30 days or $6,000 in the previous 180 days to retain the gold checkmark identifying that the account belongs to a verified brand.

...

Threatening to remove verified checkmarks is a risky move given how many ‘Twitter alternative’ services like Threads and Bluesky are cropping up and how willing consumers appear to be to jump ship, with Threads rocketing to 100 million registrations in just five days. That said, it’s not like other efforts to drum up some additional cash, like increasing API pricing, have gone down especially well, either. It’s a bold strategy, Cotton — let’s see if it pays off for him.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is he legally allowed to just shut down twitter?

[–] elbarto777 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But he has obligations from his debtors

[–] elbarto777 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, but that's another matter. If a laundromat has no desire to operate any longer, does it have to continue just because it has debt? I don't think so.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

sure, but with contracts as big like this, it's highly likely that there are some special clauses that forbids him from just killing the project outright.

Also, he'd have a hard time coming up with the cash to pay off the 20B+ bucks he borrowed. He's rich, but not in cash.

(not saying that this is the case at all, the more likelyhood is that he's just an idiot)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The value of TSLA is more relevant to his debt financing than whether Twitter is operating or not.