this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
179 points (93.2% liked)

PCGaming

6610 readers
2 users here now

Rule 0: Be civil

Rule #1: No spam, porn, or facilitating piracy

Rule #2: No advertisements

Rule #3: No memes, PCMR language, or low-effort posts/comments

Rule #4: No tech support or game help questions

Rule #5: No questions about building/buying computers, hardware, peripherals, furniture, etc.

Rule #6: No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.

Rule #7: No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts

Rule #8: No off-topic posts/comments

Rule #9: Use the original source, no editorialized titles, no duplicates

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Sounds about right. Bad side is you wait years to play the cool game.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Patient gamers.

If it is single player it's kinda fine I guess. Esp since your hardware can now probably crush that fps counter.

Sucks in multi-player if it isn't csgo cause it's a lonely life.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have a circle of friends who will choose to play something together. Right now it's Deep Rock Galactic If the patient game of choice is cheap enough, well buy the games for those who are deficient for the cost of a beer / latté.

[–] c0mbatbag3l 2 points 1 year ago

Same! Before DRG it was Valheim for us.

[–] c0mbatbag3l 2 points 1 year ago

Most of the time it's not cool when it's breaking, I'd rather pay 5.99 in a fee years for the full DLC all patches applied version.

[–] setsneedtofeed 2 points 1 year ago

Playing new indie or AA games feels alright. I’m a lot more forgiving of bugs when a game is $40 or less and the developers are actively making making improvements, than I am to a bug filled $70 AAA game.