5
Spaceship of Fools - An extensive counterpoint to the usual narrative from 2017 forward
(washingtonspectator.org)
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
5 points (72.7% liked)
UFOs
2703 readers
1 users here now
This community is for discussion surrounding UFOs and Extraterrestrials.
Rules
- Be your own moderator
- Think before you post or comment, and use your common sense about what is acceptable. This is a community space and should ultimately be community-driven. Be the community you want to see here.
- If you are here because you want to make fun of or grandstand over all of the silly people who believe that UFO/UAPs may exist, you are not welcome. Just block the community and go about your day.
- Be Civil
- No trolling or being disruptive.
- No insults or personal attacks.
- No accusations that other users are shills/agents. If you have some kind of evidence of this, please report instead.
- No hate speech or abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation.
- No harassment, threats, or advocating violence.
- No witch hunts or doxxing.
- No summarily dismissive comments (e.g. "Swamp gas.").
- Posts must be related to UFO/UAPs
- Avoid duplicate posts
- Link posts should contain the linked content and a submission statement
- Submission statements should contain a summary of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, and optionally personal perspectives.
- For short-form content, such as tweets, include the entire text.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
When you say zero evidence, what do you mean exactly? I’m not sure about it all, but there are links peppered throughout the whole thing that seemingly cite claims. Do you take all or most of them as false?
Like I said elsewhere, I’m not one to try to prove the whole phenomenon is bunk, but I can’t imagine every single last claim made in the piece is false. There’s dozens and dozens of them.
I can understand if you highly question the SEC claims in particular.
I appreciate the link being kept around. I’m not here to post stuff and be a thorn in anyone’s fun. This just happened to be a new piece with new claims about TTSA I saw that offered a different take I had not heard in the UFO echo chamber that is reddit before.
This is exactly what I am talking about. You saw links throughout the article and assumed that meant that it is well-sourced. Why don't you actually take a look at some of those links?
I did though. Including the docs sent to the SEC.
When I say “seemingly” I mean to leave room for your opinion. I’m not here to argue or push an agenda.