this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
642 points (97.1% liked)

News

23367 readers
5653 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Celeste Burgess, now 19, pleaded guilty to illegally concealing human remains after she had an abortion when around 28 weeks pregnant, beyond the 20-week limit then set by Nebraska law.

This was before the change in the law. It is certainly possible that there were medical issues or that Nebraska made it extremely difficult to get an abortion. I wish the article offered more details. 28 weeks is extremely late for an abortion.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If I am reading this right, this sentencing is not even for the abortion. It is for hiding the body.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For her, yes. The mother is being charged with providing an illegal abortion.

Not sure what the rules are for disposing of a late term abortion or what they should be.

[–] ZooGuru 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think it’s an illegal abortion because she is not licensed to provide abortions. At least that’s what I recall reading on this elsewhere. I could be mistaken as it would still have been illegal by state law of 20 weeks at the time. I do believe what this mother did is reckless. She provided a medical procedure that she isn’t qualified to oversee. All that being said, I’m pro choice, but I don’t know that this case really represents what people are saying it does.

[–] anage_oldprob 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This argument is circular since abortions after 20 weeks are prohibited. All of the qualified medicinal professionals are not allowed to provide late term abortions thus no qualified person could provide the medical care she needed. The fault is not with the mother for doing something unsafe but the state that requires that only unsafe conditions exist for the procedure.

[–] ZooGuru 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was talking about what the mother is specifically being charged with. I did a little extra looking and that charge (abortion by someone other than a licensed physician) was dismissed as she is pleading guilty to illegally providing an abortion after 20 weeks, false reporting, and tampering with human remains. I agree that restrictions on abortion have the potential to lead to unsafe abortions. I also think it’s true that someone unqualified should not attempt it. Both can be true I think.

[–] anage_oldprob 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s what I’m talking about as well. A rise in back alley abortions and thus abortions done by unqualified practitioners are a direct consequence of abortion bans. No one would need to hide “human” remains if a legal abortion was available. No one would be forced to find a provider who is available rather than qualified if the abortion was legal. One should not be judged for taking irresponsible measures if that is all that is available.

Here is a source https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2709326/

[–] ZooGuru 1 points 1 year ago

Idk that I can get with that last statement as a blanket for all cases, but I understand your point. Abortion should be legal and we as a society can still agree that someone unqualified shouldn’t be offering/providing them. I don’t think that’s unreasonable. Laws that prevent non-medical doctors from performing medical procedures would cover this, so making it specific to abortion isn’t necessary. I read an interesting write up on Jezebel about how these kinds of cases are really probing to see what the public will accept and that makes a lot of sense.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

She aborted at 28 weeks when the law at the time was 20 weeks.
She also hid the remains.

[–] tallwookie 1 points 1 year ago

well, yeah - it's a criminal act. you can't just go around hiding bodies in the bushes, that's unsafe and a clear ethical violation

[–] tallwookie 3 points 1 year ago

it's like 12 weeks now, so presumably the next person to attempt this will get a lot more than a 90-day slap on the wrist

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We're not in fetus territory, here. A premature baby born at 28 weeks has an 80-90% chance of surviving and is unlikely to have any health issues.

The article doesn't say why they waited so long to reach this decision, but on the face of it this case starts to blur the line between abortion and murder.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

A baby born at 28 weeks is absolutely likely to have health issues. What the fuck are you talking about? That would be extremely premature.

A healthy fetus has a good chance of surviving, sure. But what if she found out that the fetus had a severe medical issue that would not see it live long outside the womb? That is significantly different. The article does not give detail on that.

The face of it does not provide detail. I agree that this blurs the line but the line is blurry because of the lack of information.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

It doesn't matter what the age of the child is. Abortion at any age is not murder, because no one has the right to use someone else's body without their consent (until Republicans succeed at allowing this). You're arguing that a fetus has no right to someone's body, until it grows up and reaches a magical "goldilocks zone" where it's not too old, not too young, but juuust right. Then you say, "can't abort, it's alive, it has a right to use someone's body without their consent!" and, then, once it's born, it loses that right! The entire situation you've been manipulated into agreeing to, makes a complete mockery of the very pro-life values it's supposed to espouse.