this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
37 points (97.4% liked)

UK Politics

3448 readers
239 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The problem is that they found them and reported them, then still got fined!

That encourages people to not report it, hell, it discourages checking.... Because if you find someone and report it you get fined!

[–] TheGrandNagus 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

But if you remove the penalty, the criminals will report it and face no consequences.

But this existing system also clearly discourages legitimate people from reporting stowaways.

It's a mess without an easy solution.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Why would they report it and attract attention to themselves if the fine was removed?

I guess it would enable 1 off recruits, do it once get paid and then report it to be legally clear....

[–] TheGrandNagus 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah exactly, gives them a bit more plausible deniability if a camera or witness picks up on it

But I really don't know how well policed the channel even is, I've never been. Perhaps this is all unnecessary.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

There are huge metal fences all around the port facility. Far taller than seems practical.

This guy must have snuck in before they entered the port there's no way they could have got into the port on foot. Which means he's been in there for a while so they claim that they checked their vehicle just before they entered the port, which is what you're supposed to do. They clearly didn't because they would have found this guy otherwise.

Their claim seems to rest on the idea that he gained access to the motorhome after they entered the port (which definitely would be the responsibility of the port authorities), which is extraordinarily unlikely. After you enter the port there's an awful lot of hanging around especially now Brexit has broken everything, so you often do leave your vehicle. But there is an enormous amount of security wandering around so there's no problem doing that and also you lock your vehicle. But all that security presupposes that you didn't enter with a compromised vehicle. They don't x-ray every vehicle, only lorrys, so if somebody gets in before you enter the port, they're basically guaranteed not to be discovered.