this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
128 points (85.2% liked)

Firefox

4577 readers
384 users here now

A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You can find all of these videos as written articles, plus some extra content, at https://thelibre.news You can the channel grow by donating to the following platforms: Paypal: https://paypal.me/ni...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zecg 42 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Mozilla is NOT SELLING your DATA, but they are collecting it and sharing it with select partners in order to "stay comercially viable".

[–] [email protected] 17 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

They're not claiming a right to sell data right now, but they have removed the promise to not sell data.

That promise is a canary statement. When the canary dies it's an indication of something, usually that it's time to stop using the product/service.

More specifically, they aren't claiming the right to sell data however they want. However, they do have to follow all legal requests, and they can bill for this provision. If a government compells them to sell they have to oblige.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Right, that's the claim I saw from the Foundation over the weekend (yesterday?) - "selling data" is SUCH a nebulous legal concept that's different in many jurisdictions that it's borderline impossible to keep that language anymore.

...I'm not sure how completely I buy that, but I can see where they're coming from. I hope that the Mozilla Foundation will clarify what data is being harvested and sold to whom, but I've studied enough history to know that transparency fading isn't a good sign.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

Yeah I mean I feel like they're just being overly cautious here (as lawyers often are) when in fact there is no real precedent to support that position. The law perhaps could be interpreted to stretch the definition of sale broadly, but in practice it isn't right now.

Frankly, I find it offensive that businesses would choose to pass that minute risk onto the customer by weakening consumer rights.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

In an aggregated and anonymized manner

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Nobody believes that.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 21 hours ago

I would replace that "aggregated and anonymized" with an and/or, as that is consistent with the language in Mozilla's privacy policy. The distinction is fairly important because de-anonymizing user data is a practice of its own and exactly what it sounds like.

Now, is the data which Mozilla "shares with" (sells to) its partners anonymized reliably enough that the identity of the person it relates to can never be rediscovered? Granting Mozilla the benefit of the doubt, if it is sufficiently anonymous today, could future developments lead to de-anonymization of that data at a later date? This could include leaks, cyber-attacks directed at Mozilla, AI-assisted statistical analysis of bulk data, etc.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

In an aggregated and anonymized manner

Phew, what a relief, that puts my concerns about powerful actors abusing that aggregated data fully to rest!

[–] asdfasdfasdf 3 points 21 hours ago

Just like Google