21
Ageing nuclear plant in Florida at risk from climate crisis, advocates warn
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
21 points (100.0% liked)
US News
132 readers
97 users here now
US-specific news, no politics
Rules:
- No politics. Nothing about governments, parties, or politicians. I love politics but this is not a politics community, there are plenty of those. [email protected] is recommended.
- Reliable sources only.
- Articles are good. Self-posts or blog posts by professionals or journalists are fine. Memes or random blogs, no.
- Post title must match the headline. Edits for clarity are fine.
- Don't be a jerk.
- No racism, no bigotry, no spam.
- Be productive.
Other communities of interest:
Icon courtesy Dighital - Flaticon
founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Putting a nuclear power plant in Florida is by far the dumbest thing I'll read all day.
But nuclear is “safe”! And “clean”!
/s
It actually is though. Even counting Chernobyl it has fewer deaths per kwh than wind energy.
Then I guess Florida has nothing to worry about. I’ve never heard of wind energy killing anyone. Did someone fall off a turbine while servicing it or something?
Yeah that's the most common case. It's big construction, so there'll always be some hazard there.
Solar is a little lower than nuclear, presumably because you don't need to work with heights.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/494425/death-rate-worldwide-by-energy-source/